LATVIA

Latvian parliament rejected amendments to the Law on Gambling and Lotteries

Latvian parliament decided 15 April to reject amendments to the Law on Gambling and Lotteries. The proposed amendments would have been used to limit gambling in the country.

These amendments were developed by members of the New Conservative Party and KPV LV. Saeima deputy Juris Jurašs urged other members of the parliament to support this legislative draft, commenting that about 80 000 people in Latvia suffer from gambling addiction and for 15 000 of them this problem is severe.

He believes the proposed amendments would become a small step towards forming a healthier society. «Gambling halls in Latvia are a lasting disease that certain people rich, it needs to be treated,» he said.

Jurašs stressed in particular that the gambling situation is critical. After the parliament had rejected the legislative draft Saeima deputy Krišjānis Feldmans from New Conservative Party wrote on his Twitter profile that Attīstībai/Par! political party is a plague for Latvian politics, commenting how the party voted against limiting gambling.

Opposition deputy Nikolajs Kabanovs from Harmony said gambling halls have been closed since the declaration of the state of emergency, adding that authors of the legislative draft are trying to use it to «distract people from the government’s inability to execute its authority and organise the work of the Ministry of the Interior and Ministry of Justice in a way to make it impossible for criminal elements to operate in Latvia.»

35 Saeima deputies voted in favour of passing the draft to the Budget and Finance Committee, 15 voted against, and 27 deputies abstained. And so the legislative draft was rejected somehow.

The annotation mentions that the purpose of the proposed amendments is limiting the number of gambling locations in Latvia and reducing the negative effect gambling has on public health and people in general.

The legislative draft explains that people who participate in gambling and lotteries are subjected to an excessive addiction risk. Gambling addition or a pathological need to engage in gambling is characterized with frequent gambling episodes, which quickly become the person’s main point of interest, impacting his or her social, professional, and family values, as well as negatively impacting his or her finances.

According to the study performed by SKDS in 2016, 26% of respondents who engaged in gambling in the past 12 months admitted having situations when gambling took over so much of their life that the outside world ceased to exist to them for some time.

The legislative draft also proposed making it so that casinos would be permitted only in four or five-star hotels in Latvia.

The annotation mentions that studies show that localization or limitation of gambling halls and casinos is one of the ways to limit and reduce problematic gambling habits.

It was also planned to impose a limit on open hours of gambling halls.

Deputies also proposed prohibiting alimony avoiders from engaging in gambling. The Maintenance Guarantee Fund Law already provides multiple restrictions for debtors to motivate them to fulfil their duties – pay alimony and provide their children with finances.

Source: https://bnn-news.com

Andriey Nabukhotnyi

Former editor-in-chief of Ukrainian specialized magazine catalogue Entertainment Industry. Andriey is E-Play's observer of Eastern European gambling market.

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

9 + 9 =